On 07/12/2018 10:01 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 09:37:47 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> So far we are setting only fake secret and storage drivers.
> Therefore if the code wants to call a public NWFilter API (like
> qemuBuildInterfaceCommandLine() and qemuBuildNetCommandLine() are
> doing) the virGetConnectNWFilter() function will try to actually
> spawn session daemon because there's no connection object set to
> handle NWFilter driver.
>
> Even though I haven't experienced the same problem with the rest
> of the drivers (interface, network and node dev), the reasoning
> above can be applied to them as well.
>
> At the same time, now that connection object is registered for
> the drivers, the public APIs will throw
> virReportUnsupportedError(). And since we don't provide any error
> func the error is printed to stderr. Fix this by setting dummy
> error func.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
[...]
>
> @@ -652,6 +656,8 @@ mymain(void)
> return EXIT_FAILURE;
> }
>
> + virTestQuiesceLibvirtErrors(true);
> +
NACK, this suppresses legitimate errors in the testsuite.
I've mangled one of the XML files and ran the qemuxml2argvtest with
VIR_TEST_DEBUG=1 and got:
249) QEMU XML-2-startup-XML disk-drive-cache-directsync ... SKIP
250) QEMU XML-2-ARGV disk-drive-cache-unsafe ... FAILED
251) QEMU XML-2-startup-XML disk-drive-cache-unsafe ... SKIP
Without this patch I'd get:
249) QEMU XML-2-startup-XML disk-drive-cache-directsync ... SKIP
250) QEMU XML-2-ARGV disk-drive-cache-unsafe ... libvirt:
Domain Config error : unsupported configuration: unknown disk cache mode 'unafe'
FAILED
251) QEMU XML-2-startup-XML disk-drive-cache-unsafe ... SKIP
Well, without it I get:
tests $ ./qemuxml2argvtest
TEST: qemuxml2argvtest
._._._._..._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 40
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 80
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 120
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 160
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 200
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._..._._._ 240
.._._._._._...._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 280
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 320
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 360
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 400
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 440
._._._._._._._._libvirt: Network Filter Driver error : internal
error: unexpected nwfilter URI path '/session', try nwfilter:///system
libvirt: Network Filter Driver error : internal error: unexpected
nwfilter URI path '/session', try nwfilter:///system
libvirt: Network Filter Driver error : internal error: unexpected
nwfilter URI path '/session', try nwfilter:///system
libvirt: Network Filter Driver error : internal error: unexpected
nwfilter URI path '/session', try nwfilter:///system
libvirt: Network Filter Driver error : internal error: unexpected
nwfilter URI path '/session', try nwfilter:///system
._._._._._._._._._._._._ 480
So do you have any other idea? I came up with two already and neither of
them got through review. Just to remind everybody, we are possibly
touching live user data here so we need a resolution rather sooner than
later.
Michal