Re: [libvirt] Mac Port of Libvirt
On 9/8/08 12:17 AM, "Daniel Veillard" <veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:43:41AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
> Thanks Daniel,
>
>> Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more
>> complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux
>> hypervisor support.
> Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more?
Because that's code which would have to be designed/ported, instead of
just recompiling completely generic code which has already been ported
to Windows.
> By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd
> running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)?
You should not assume this is possible.
Just curious, why there is an option "--without-libvirtd" in configure?
(Which actually works and make will not produce libvirtd.exe)
Many many thanks for your help!
-Yushu
Daniel