On 03/08/2018 11:07 AM, Farhan Ali wrote:
QEMU on S390 (since v2.11) can support the virtio-gpu-ccw device,
so on S390 assign CCW address for a video device.
Also introduce a new capability for the virtio-gpu-ccw
device.
Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
docs/formatdomain.html.in | 3 +
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 5 ++
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 +
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 18 ++++-
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 2 +-
src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 8 +++
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 5 +-
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.replies | 83 +++++++++++++++++++---
tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.xml | 3 +-
9 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
First off - other upstream changes has caused this to not be able to
apply w/ git am -3 - so once patch1 is pushed, you'll need to rework and
repost the series (hopefully this time you won't have the strange split
with a CC address having "--dry-run" appended to an email ;-)
Since I cannot compile this one - I'll just be able to go through
visually and note a few things... Primarily though - this particular
patch should be split up a bit more. Separate out the capabilities into
their own separate "capabilities" patch and the second patch becomes a
"functionality" patch.
diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index 6fd2189..0908709 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -6484,6 +6484,9 @@ qemu-kvm -net nic,model=? /dev/null
<dd>
The optional <code>address</code> sub-element can be used to
tie the video device to a particular PCI slot.
+ On S390, <code>address</code> can be used to provide the
+ CCW address for the video device (<span class="since">
+ since 4.2.0</span>).
</dd>
<dt><code>driver</code></dt>
... The above would go with the "functionality" patch and the next few
with a "capability" patch...
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
index b5eb8cf..9db4c31 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
@@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virQEMUCaps, QEMU_CAPS_LAST,
"pl011",
"machine.pseries.max-cpu-compat",
"dump-completed",
+ "virtio-gpu-ccw",
);
@@ -1694,6 +1695,7 @@ struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsObjectTypes[] = {
{ "sclplmconsole", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_SCLPLMCONSOLE },
{ "isa-serial", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_ISA_SERIAL },
{ "pl011", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_PL011 },
+ { "virtio-gpu-ccw", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU_CCW },
};
static struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsObjectPropsVirtioBalloon[] = {
@@ -1932,6 +1934,9 @@ static struct virQEMUCapsObjectTypeProps virQEMUCapsObjectProps[] =
{
{ "spapr-pci-host-bridge", virQEMUCapsObjectPropsSpaprPCIHostBridge,
ARRAY_CARDINALITY(virQEMUCapsObjectPropsSpaprPCIHostBridge),
QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE },
+ { "virtio-gpu-ccw", virQEMUCapsObjectPropsVirtioGpu,
+ ARRAY_CARDINALITY(virQEMUCapsObjectPropsVirtioGpu),
+ QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU_CCW },
};
struct virQEMUCapsPropTypeObjects {
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
index c2ec2be..b4852e5 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ typedef enum {
QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_PL011, /* -device pl011 (not user-instantiable) */
QEMU_CAPS_MACHINE_PSERIES_MAX_CPU_COMPAT, /* -machine pseries,max-cpu-compat= */
QEMU_CAPS_DUMP_COMPLETED, /* DUMP_COMPLETED event */
+ QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU_CCW, /* -device virtio-gpu-ccw */
QEMU_CAPS_LAST /* this must always be the last item */
} virQEMUCapsFlags;
... Above here with the "capability" patch and below with the
"functionality" patch...
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index fa0aa5d..ba63670 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ VIR_ENUM_IMPL(qemuDeviceVideoSecondary, VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_LAST,
"", /* don't support vbox */
"qxl",
"", /* don't support parallels */
- "virtio-gpu-pci",
+ "virtio-gpu",
"" /* don't support gop */);
VIR_ENUM_DECL(qemuSoundCodec)
@@ -4262,7 +4262,21 @@ qemuBuildDeviceVideoStr(const virDomainDef *def,
goto error;
}
- virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s,id=%s", model, video->info.alias);
+ if (STREQ(model, "virtio-gpu")) {
Rather than STREQ comparison perhaps:
if (video->type == VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_VIRTIO) {
since that's what derives "virtio-gpu" for model anyway.
+ switch (video->info.type) {
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI:
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s-pci", model);
+ break;
+
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_CCW:
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s-ccw", model);
+ break;
+ }
Let's not use a switch here - as that implies there could be more than
just two values in the '.type' field... I'd go with:
if (video->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_CCW)
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s-ccw", model);
else
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s-pci", model);
+ } else {
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s", model);
+ }
+
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",id=%s", video->info.alias);
if (video->accel && video->accel->accel3d ==
VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_ON) {
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",virgl=%s",
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
index ee02ecd..b47b4d1 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
@@ -5156,7 +5156,7 @@ qemuDomainDeviceDefPostParse(virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev,
if (dev->data.video->type == VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_DEFAULT) {
if ARCH_IS_PPC64(def->os.arch)
dev->data.video->type = VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_VGA;
- else if (qemuDomainIsVirt(def))
+ else if (qemuDomainIsVirt(def) || ARCH_IS_S390(def->os.arch))
dev->data.video->type = VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_VIRTIO;
else
dev->data.video->type = VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_CIRRUS;
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
index ae49cf2..49a293e 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
@@ -308,6 +308,14 @@ qemuDomainPrimeVirtioDeviceAddresses(virDomainDefPtr def,
}
}
There's a comment at the top of the function that could add "video" to
the list as well...
+ for (i = 0; i < def->nvideos; i++) {
+ virDomainVideoDefPtr video = def->videos[i];
+
+ if (video->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE &&
+ video->type == VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_VIRTIO)
+ video->info.type = type;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < def->ninputs; i++) {
if (def->inputs[i]->bus == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_BUS_VIRTIO &&
def->inputs[i]->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index 57c06c7..1afb71f 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -4778,7 +4778,10 @@ qemuProcessStartValidateVideo(virDomainObjPtr vm,
(video->type == VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_QXL &&
!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_QXL)) ||
(video->type == VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_VIRTIO &&
- !virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU))) {
+ !virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU)) ||
+ (video->type == VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_VIRTIO &&
+ video->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_CCW &&
+ !virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU_CCW))) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
_("this QEMU does not support '%s' video
device"),
virDomainVideoTypeToString(video->type));
... The rest would go with the capabilities patch....
diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.replies
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.replies
index 6768937..53c4804 100644
--- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.replies
+++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.replies
@@ -3515,6 +3515,71 @@
{
"return": [
{
+ "name": "notify_on_empty",
+ "description": "on/off",
+ "type": "bool"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "ioeventfd",
+ "description": "on/off",
+ "type": "bool"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "any_layout",
+ "description": "on/off",
+ "type": "bool"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "devno",
+ "description": "Identifier of an I/O device in the channel
subsystem, example: fe.1.23ab",
+ "type": "str"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "indirect_desc",
+ "description": "on/off",
+ "type": "bool"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "event_idx",
+ "description": "on/off",
+ "type": "bool"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "virtio-backend",
+ "type": "child<virtio-gpu-device>"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "yres",
+ "type": "uint32"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "xres",
+ "type": "uint32"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "iommu_platform",
+ "description": "on/off",
+ "type": "bool"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "max_outputs",
+ "type": "uint32"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "max_hostmem",
+ "type": "size"
+ },
+ {
+ "name": "max_revision",
+ "type": "uint32"
+ }
+ ],
+ "id": "libvirt-41"
+}
+
+{
+ "return": [
+ {
"hotpluggable-cpus": true,
"name": "s390-ccw-virtio-2.7",
"cpu-max": 248
@@ -3562,7 +3627,7 @@
"cpu-max": 248
}
],
- "id": "libvirt-41"
+ "id": "libvirt-42"
}
{
@@ -4096,20 +4161,20 @@
"migration-safe": true
}
],
- "id": "libvirt-42"
+ "id": "libvirt-43"
}
{
"return": [
],
- "id": "libvirt-43"
+ "id": "libvirt-44"
}
{
"return": [
"emulator"
],
- "id": "libvirt-44"
+ "id": "libvirt-45"
}
{
@@ -5230,7 +5295,7 @@
"option": "drive"
}
],
- "id": "libvirt-45"
+ "id": "libvirt-46"
}
{
@@ -5288,7 +5353,7 @@
"capability": "x-multifd"
}
],
- "id": "libvirt-46"
+ "id": "libvirt-47"
}
{
@@ -15156,7 +15221,7 @@
"meta-type": "object"
}
],
- "id": "libvirt-47"
+ "id": "libvirt-48"
}
{
@@ -15195,11 +15260,11 @@
}
}
},
- "id": "libvirt-48"
+ "id": "libvirt-49"
}
{
- "id": "libvirt-49",
+ "id": "libvirt-50",
"error": {
"class": "GenericError",
"desc": "Property '.migratable' not found"
diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.xml
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.xml
index f7f102f..ec5c396 100644
--- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.xml
+++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.11.0.s390x.xml
@@ -146,9 +146,10 @@
<flag name='disk-share-rw'/>
<flag name='iscsi.password-secret'/>
<flag name='dump-completed'/>
+ <flag name='virtio-gpu-ccw'/>
<version>2011000</version>
<kvmVersion>0</kvmVersion>
- <microcodeVersion>341724</microcodeVersion>
+ <microcodeVersion>342885</microcodeVersion>
<sigh> - I assume this is because someone updated something after the
original pull of the 2.11 caps...
You used the VIR_TEST_REGENERATE_OUTPUT=1 to create too, right?
John
<package></package>
<arch>s390x</arch>
<hostCPU type='kvm' model='z14-base'
migratability='no'>