Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> writes:
> On 5/17/22 10:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> This remains, and that's fine. One step at time.
>> Not sure how we want to proceed with that in the long run, though
>> ... IIRC clearly, Paolo once said that it doesn't really belong into
>> "-display" anyway and should be handled with the separate
"-vnc"
>> option instead?
>
> Not me, Gerd
>
(
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210825092023.81396-2-thuth@redhat.com/T/#e8...):
>
>> Other way around, -display vnc should be dropped. -display is about
>> local displays, and there can be only one instance. -vnc / -spice
>> enable remote access, and this can be done in addition to a local
>> display.
>> not possible:
>> -display gtk + -display sdl
>> possible:
>> -display gtk + -vnc
>> -display gtk + -vnc + -spice
>> -display none + -vnc + -spice
>
> For what it's worth, Libvirt uses both -vnc and -spice, so we might
> very well proceed with Gerd's idea. If we don't like -vnc and -spice
> then it may be possible to QOMify them and go with -object.
Are we ready to deprecate -display vnc?