On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:51:57PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 3/15/19 7:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:51:50PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
>>
>> On 1/18/19 3:39 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
>>> I proceeded with cloning [1] to systemd and creating an udev rule that I
planned
>>> on submitting to systemd upstream - the initial idea was to mimic /dev/kvm
and
>>> make it world accessible to which Brijesh from AMD expressed a concern that
>>> regular users might deplete the resources (limit on the number of guests
>>> allowed by the platform).
>
> [snip]
>
>>> But since the limit is claimed to be around 4, Dan
>>
>>
>> FYI, the limit on EPYC is 15.
>
> Do any cRyzen CPUs support SEV, and if so is their limit also 15 ?
>
SEV support is *not* available on any of Ryzen's yet!
Ok, thanks for clarifying.
> Regardless, I'm assuming this limit is liable to change at
any time
> in future CPU generations, so from the the mgmt app perspective I
> think is is important that QEMU / libvirt can both report what this
> limit is.
>
Yes, the limit may change on future CPU generations. We can query the
limit through the CPUID Fn0x8000_001f[ECX].
That's nice!
> For QEMU I think query-sev-capabilities probably should report
the
> guest limit. I guess QEMU would in turn want to ask the kernel,
> rather than hardcode info itself. So if this info isn't already
> exposed by the kernel we might need work there too.
>
I don't think we need to add a kernel interface for querying this
information, it can be obtained using the cpuid instruction or
access its via /dev/cpuid/<cpu>.
Agreed, using CPUID direct from QEMU ought to be sufficient.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|