Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/3] schemas: finish virTristate{Bool, Switch} transition

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:54:51AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 09/08/2014 07:40 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com&gt; >> ---

>> + <ref name="virSwitch"/> > > Purely cosmetic, but how about calling them "virYesNo" and "virOnOff" to > avoid confusion? When I see "virBool" I think "true/false", and when I > see "virSwitch" I think "Does this have something to do with a network > device?" :-) > That's another way (and makes more sense). I just wanted to shorten the "Tristate" since it's not a tristate anyway. Should I count it as an ACK for s/virSwitch/virOnOff/ and s/virBool/virYesNo/ ?