Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] libvirtd: don't ignore virInitialize failure

I almost missed this; it was so similar to what I though was the sole ignore-virInitialize-failure bug (in python set-up) that I thought I'd already fixed it. >From f48e364b6f2182f7fa88862b2e1a789e2d83a027 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com&gt; Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:52:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] libvirtd: don't ignore virInitialize failure * daemon/libvirtd.c (main): Diagnose virInitialize failure and exit nonzero. --- daemon/libvirtd.c | 5 ++++- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/libvirtd.c b/daemon/libvirtd.c index afa10fb..aac2d08 100644 --- a/daemon/libvirtd.c +++ b/daemon/libvirtd.c @@ -3028,7 +3028,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) { {0, 0, 0, 0} }; - virInitialize(); + if (virInitialize() < 0) { + fprintf (stderr, _("libvirtd: initialization failed\n")); + exit (EXIT_FAILURE); + }