On 01/26/2012 01:35 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:18:03 -0700
Eric Blake<eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> [adding qemu-devel]
>
> On 01/26/2012 07:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> One thing, that you'll probably notice is this
>>> 'set-support-level' command. Basically, it tells GA what qemu
version
>>> is it running on. Ideally, this should be done as soon as
>>> GA starts up. However, that cannot be determined from outside
>>> world as GA doesn't emit any events yet.
>>> Ideally^2 this command should be left out as it should be qemu
>>> who tells its own agent this kind of information.
>>> Anyway, I was going to call this command in qemuProcess{Startup,
>>> Reconnect,Attach}, but it won't work. We need to un-pause guest CPUs
>>> so guest can boot and start GA, but that implies returning from
qemuProcess*.
>>>
>>> So I am setting this just before 'guest-suspend' command, as
>>> there is one more thing about GA. It is unable to remember anything
>>> upon its restart (GA process). Which has BTW show flaw
>>> in our current code with FS freeze& thaw. If we freeze guest
>>> FS, and somebody restart GA, the simple FS Thaw will not succeed as
>>> GA thinks FS are not frozen. But that's a different cup of tea.
>>>
>>> Because of what written above, we need to call set-level
>>> on every suspend.
>>
>>
>> IMHO all this says that the 'set-level' command is a conceptually
>> unfixably broken design& should be killed in QEMU before it turns
>> into an even bigger mess.
Can you elaborate on this? Michal and I talked on irc about making the
compatibility level persistent, would that help?
>> Once we're in a situation where we need to call 'set-level' prior
>> to every single invocation, you might as well just allow the QEMU
>> version number to be passed in directly as an arg to the command
>> you are running directly thus avoiding this horrificness.
>
> Qemu folks, would you care to chime in on this?
>
> Exactly how is the set-level command supposed to work? As I understand
> it, the goal is that if the guest has qemu-ga 1.1 installed, but is
> being run by qemu 1.0, then we want to ensure that any guest agent
> command supported by qemu-ga 1.1 but requiring features of qemu not
> present in qemu 1.0 will be properly rejected.
Not exactly, the default support of qemu-ga is qemu 1.0. This means that by
default qemu-ga will only support qemu 1.0 even when running on qemu 2.0. This
way the set-support-level command allows you to specify that qemu 2.0 features
are supported.
Version numbers are meaningless. What happens when a bunch of features get
backported by RHEL such that qemu-ga 1.0 ends up being a frankenstein version of
2.0?
The feature negotiation mechanism we have in QMP is the existence of a command.
If we're in a position where we're trying to disable part of a command, it
simply means that we should have multiple commands such that we can just remove
the disabled part entirely.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori