On 02/11/2011 03:39 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hi,
I recently started looking at libvirt code, and while reading hash.c,
I noticed a few buglets and some cleanup that could be done. I was
planning to test them carefully before sending them (ie make sure
there's a unit test for this code), but since I don't know when I have
time for that, and since make check and make syntax-check are passing,
I'm just sending them for an initial review :)
If you prefer the patches inline/in separate mails, just let me know.
Thanks for your efforts so far; I've run out of time to review them much
today, other than to point out that the patches state n/8 but there are
only 6 of them.
Yes, we prefer one patch per email all threaded together (git send-email
-8 can do the right thing), as it's easier to comment on one patch at a
time in that manner (if some of your patches are ready to be applied
while others need rework, for example).
Also, a question on 5/8, where you added calls to the OOM reporter - did
you check that all hash table clients elsewhere in the code base are not
duplicating the call when they get a NULL return?
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org