On 2012年09月14日 05:04, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/10/2012 06:08 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> As a result of RFC:
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-August/msg01998.html,
> this adds two new APIs (virNode{Get,Set}SharedMemoryParameters) to get
I still think this name is too long; virNode{Get,Set}MemoryParameters
seems just fine, and is more extensible if we come up with a future node
memory turning not related to just how shared memory behaves. Anyone
else have an opinion on naming, since I'd like to see the API itself in
0.10.2?
Hi, Eric,
It's trivial to change the name, and it doesn't affect review the left
patches, so if you are free, can you review the left ones too? I'm
afraid the window between posts could past the freezing date.
Regards,
Osier