According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2010 3:45 AM:
> Hum, that one I'm not sure. In the case of virBufferGrow
failure,
> we just did va_end(locarg); in the loop before, so going to cleanup
> there does it twice, and I'm not sure it's legal. Probably simpler to
> add just va_end(argptr); before return in that case and drop the
> cleanup: target.
Good catch. Corrected, as you suggest:
+++ b/.gnulib
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit 11fbc57405a118e6ec9a3ebc19bbf5ececdae4d6
+Subproject commit a1d565aa5b47ec56243e74d4ac8b4988a751fef2
Why the change in .gnulib? Shouldn't that be an independent patch?
--
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake ebb9(a)byu.net