Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v4 01/20] snapshots: Avoid term 'checkpoint' for full system snapshot

On 2/6/19 2:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Upcoming patches plan to introduce virDomainCheckpointPtr as a new > object for use in incremental backups, along with documentation on > how incremental backups differ from snapshots. But first, we need > to rename any existing mention of a 'system checkpoint' to instead > be a 'full system snapshot', so that we aren't overloading > the term checkpoint. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com&gt; > > --- > v2: wording improvements based on review > --- > include/libvirt/libvirt-domain-snapshot.h | 2 +- > docs/formatsnapshot.html.in | 31 +++++++++++------------ > src/conf/snapshot_conf.c | 4 +-- > src/libvirt-domain-snapshot.c | 7 ++--- > src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 12 ++++----- > tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 2 +- > tools/virsh.pod | 14 +++++----- > 7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > Figured I'd start this and continue on Monday In my "scan" of this I found it "interesting" that eventually as we get closer to the user docs there's an emphasis to know the difference between external and internal snapshots... Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com&gt;