On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 18:56 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> +/**
> + * virHostdevPCINodeDeviceReAttach:
^^ Oy ReAttach vs. Reattach is an eye test ;-)
Maybe we should standardize on either one or the other? I personally
consider "ReAttach" to be quite an eyesore, but then again it's all
over the public API so it's not going anywhere...
> + * @hostdev_mgr: hostdev manager
> + * @pci: PCI device
Perhaps better to indicate a "new"ly generated PCI device that does not
track the internal reattach states and other state information such as
the stub driver.
IOW: this is not a copy of an [in]activePCIHostdevs element
Great idea! Maybe even use a different name for the parameter, based
on whether the virPCIDevicePtr is going to be used for something other
than looking up the actual device?
Cheers.
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team