Le 11/01/2016 17:32, John Ferlan a écrit :
On 01/11/2016 12:50 PM, Joe Harvell wrote:
>> John/Jan:
>>
>> I actually made a patch similar to this and was about to submit it for
>> review. Now I see there is a more thorough version here already
>> submitted just over a year ago. I don't see any evidence of this in
>> the git repo. Are there any plans to commit it?
>>
>> ---
>> Joe Harvell
>>
>> --
>> libvir-list mailing list
>> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> I was referring to John's patch posted on 12 Dec 2014.
>
For those that don't keep that much history in their mailbox...
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00706.html
There's also a related bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060287
So from my perspective, this has languished in one of my local git
branches. I got busy with other things and this has never really
surfaced to anywhere near the top of my todo list.
John
That's what I suspected. If the testing part is why it's languishing,
here is a simpler patch with less functionality. This patch just makes
Thin LVs and Snapshot Thin LVs (once you activate them) detectable by
libvirt. Would it be worth me submitting this as a patch?
---
Joe