Re: [Libvir] A question about libvirt usage
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:10:27PM +0200, Philippe Berthault wrote:
Is there a notion of session in libvirt ?
In other words, is it possible, between virConnectOpen() and
virConnectClose(), that some Xen domains will be started, stopped,
destroyed, etc.. by another operator using the xm command ou by another
binary command based on libvirt.
yes
If the response is yes, is it possible to introduce a global lock in
Xen
(or in libvirt ?) to avoid conflict between libvirt and xm command or
between several libvirt based commands.
A global lock on Xen is not possible, libvirt connect to Xen only though
an RPC (well in most cases) and any other app could do the same kind of
RPC. I don't think having a lock is possible. And even if you had a lock
a root process on domain 0 coul always do a direct hypervisor call for
example to kill a domain.
In a nutshell with the current (lack of) authentication in Xen you
just can't garantee absence of conflict, and this is not a limitation
coming from libvirt.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/