On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:48:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index 4818cfb..b77914e 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -17524,7 +17524,7 @@ virDomainDefFormatInternal(virDomainDefPtr def,
goto error;
}
virBufferAsprintf(buf,
- "<memnode nodeid='%zu' mode='%s'
nodeset='%s'/>\n",
+ "<memnode cellid='%zu' mode='%s'
nodeset='%s'/>\n",
i, mode, nodemask);
VIR_FREE(nodemask);
}
Presumably this belongs in an earlier patch in the series.
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c
index b1bfb5a..ce03a4f 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c
@@ -588,6 +588,8 @@ qemuSetupCpusetCgroup(virDomainObjPtr vm,
if (!virCgroupHasController(priv->cgroup, VIR_CGROUP_CONTROLLER_CPUSET))
return 0;
+ /* ASDF: per-node pinnings are not reflected here */
Are you refering to per-node vCPU pinnings here ?
We already have a per-vCPU pin capability in both the XML and the
cgroup setup code and the new <memnode> affinity mask you're adding
presumably only applies to memory, not vCPUs, otherwise we'd be
effectively having two places to set the same info.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|