On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:18:43PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:39:29PM +0100, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 1/26/24 11:21, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Can you please take another look at this patch (as well as the other
> > one that contains alpha-specific changes) in light of the arguments
> > that I've provided above? Thanks.
>
> I don't want to override Dan, but to me this makes sense. Unless he
> disagrees, you have my:
Go for it.
I still maintain no one should waste a second of effort on an
architecture that was dead before libvirt even started as a
project, but won't block this.
Thanks, I appreciate that!
Any chance either of you could look at the other patch[1] as well?
The connection to alpha is sort of tangential in that case, what's
more important is that we're currently not using -fstack-protector
on aarch64 even though we should.
[1]
https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/R5...
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization