On 08/18/2012 12:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Not complete, but this is what I got done in a couple hours after
complaining about Osier's series:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-August/msg01247.html
I hadn't noticed that virsh.c was split up like that either, but
definitely I agree. Although I earlier begrudgingly went along with
having the virsh-edit.c template #included by virsh.c (simply because it
was better than what it was replacing), in general #including .c files
is a very gross and misleading hack that should be avoided.