On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:35:58PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
On 20.09.2017 16:30, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:58:55PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>> saferead is not suitable for direct reads. If file size is not multiple
>> of align size then we get EINVAL on the read(2) that is supposed to
>> return 0 because read buffer will not be aligned at this point.
>>
>> Let's not read again after partial read and check that we read
>> everything by comparing the number of total bytes read against file size.
>
> What scenario did you actually hit this problem in ? IIUC, we should
> only be using O_DIRECT against block devices or plain files, and in both
> those cases we should never see short-read unless we hit EOF.
Yes. But saferead is generic function and rereads file after short read.
Here we got EINVAL because of misalignement.
I understand that, but how have you actually hit this in the real world.
AFAICT, the short-read and subsequent problem with misalignemt should be
impossible to hit, because any files we use O_DIRECT on should not ever
return a shortread.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|