Re: [libvirt] version script and non-existent symbols
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:32:03PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> It's actually not clear to me why some of these are even in
the version
> script. For example, why is brSetEnableSTP() there?
It is used from the network_driver.c file, and that is linked to the
daemon
Hmm I'd missed that. A weird source code setup?
reason. Then, if we build drivers as dlopen()'able modules, even
more
Oh, I forgot about that. OK. What is the purpose of the dlopen()
version? Are people to be expected to deliver modules separately? Is it
just a minimisation thing?
regards
john