On 5/30/22, 6:09 AM, "Michal Prívozník" <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/18/22 09:59, Haibin Huang wrote:
> From: Lin Yang <lin.a.yang(a)intel.com>
>
> According to the result parsing from xml, add the argument of
> SGX EPC memory backend into QEMU command line:
>
> #qemu-system-x86_64 \
> ...... \
> -object memory-backend-epc,id=memepc0,size=64M,prealloc=on \
> -object memory-backend-epc,id=memepc1,size=28M \
> -machine sgx-epc.0.memdev=memepc0,sgx-epc.1.memdev=memepc1
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Yang <lin.a.yang(a)intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibin Huang <haibin.huang(a)intel.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_alias.c | 3 +-
> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../sgx-epc.x86_64-6.2.0.args | 37 +++++++++++++
> tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/sgx-epc.x86_64-6.2.0.args
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_alias.c b/src/qemu/qemu_alias.c
> index e5a946cbed..03c79bcf0e 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_alias.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_alias.c
> @@ -467,7 +467,8 @@ qemuDeviceMemoryGetAliasID(virDomainDef *def,
> * valid */
> if (!oldAlias &&
> mem->model != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_VIRTIO_PMEM &&
> - mem->model != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_VIRTIO_MEM)
> + mem->model != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_VIRTIO_MEM &&
> + mem->model != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_SGX_EPC)
> return mem->info.addr.dimm.slot;
>
> for (i = 0; i < def->nmems; i++) {
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> index 4807b137b6..9c83f0e168 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> @@ -3774,6 +3774,10 @@ qemuBuildMemoryBackendProps(virJSONValue **backendProps,
> if (systemMemory)
> disableCanonicalPath = true;
>
> + } else if (mem->model == VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_SGX_EPC) {
> + backendType = "memory-backend-epc";
> + if (!priv->memPrealloc)
> + prealloc = true;
> } else if (useHugepage || mem->nvdimmPath || memAccess ||
> def->mem.source == VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_SOURCE_FILE) {
>
> @@ -3934,6 +3938,11 @@ qemuBuildMemoryBackendProps(virJSONValue **backendProps,
> _("this qemu doesn't support the "
> "memory-backend-memfd object"));
> return -1;
> + } else if (STREQ(backendType, "memory-backend-epc") &&
> + !virQEMUCapsGet(priv->qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_SGX_EPC)) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
> + _("this qemu doesn't support the
memory-backend-epc object"));
> + return -1;
> }
>
> rc = 0;
> @@ -6979,6 +6988,7 @@ qemuBuildMachineCommandLine(virCommand *cmd,
> virCPUDef *cpu = def->cpu;
> g_auto(virBuffer) buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;
> size_t i;
> + int epcNum = 0;
>
> virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-machine");
> virBufferAdd(&buf, def->os.machine, -1);
> @@ -7199,6 +7209,25 @@ qemuBuildMachineCommandLine(virCommand *cmd,
> virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",graphics=off");
> }
>
> + /* add sgx epc memory to -machine parameter */
> + for (i = 0; i < def->nmems; i++) {
> + switch ((virDomainMemoryModel) def->mems[i]->model) {
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_SGX_EPC:
> + virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",sgx-epc.%d.memdev=mem%s",
epcNum++,
> + def->mems[i]->info.alias);
So there really isn't any better way to specify sgx-epc than through -M?
This way libvirt loses capability to set th device @id attribute which
means we have to jump through hoops (like in your patch 2/6) when the
@id value is expected.
I vaguely pointing this out earlier (but maybe I just thought about
pointing it out and never did - it's been a while since I've reviewed
these patches), but I don't know what the consensus was.
I was not involved in the QEMU SGX patches review process and don’t
know the reason why it use -machine instead of -device. The initial
patch introduce separate QEMU argument -sgx-epc, but finally was
updated to -machine according to the comments.
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg00644.html
Thanks,
Lin.