On 02/16/2016 09:46 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:36:58AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/16/2016 08:58 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:37:22PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> Move the functions into qemu_domain.c - additionally move any supporting
>>> static functions.
>>>
>>> Make qemuDomainSupportsPCI non static.
>>>
>>> Also, move and rename the following:
>>>
>>> qemuSetSCSIControllerModel to qemuDomainSetSCSIControllerModel
ACK to the move of qemuSetSCSIControllerModel to qemu_domain.c
>>> qemuCollectPCIAddress to qemuDomainCollectPCIAddress
>>> qemuValidateDevicePCISlotsPIIX3 to qemuDomainValidateDevicePCISlotsPIIX3
>>> qemuAssignDevicePCISlots to qemuDomainAssignDevicePCISlots
>>>
And the rest of the functions to to qemu_domain_addr.c.
Right instead of moving that hunk of code to qemu_domain.c, I'll create
qemu_domain_address.c and qemu_domain_address.h and move the hunk there
instead (and of course deal with the build fallout - say nothing of the
merge conflicts ;-))
>>
>> Most of these deal with domain addresses and qemu_domain.c is growing
>> pretty large. I think they deserve a qemu_domain_addr.c module. (On the
>> other hand, strictly sticking to the qemuDomainAddr prefix will make the
>> function names too long)
>>
>> Jan
>>
>
> So if this was a create a qemu_domain_addr.c module and move those
> functions in there, would that work for you? Someone else can move
> other virDomain*Address* functions afterwards... For some reason I have
> a recollection of another thread on that a while back.
>
> w/r/t the qemuDomain vs. qemuDomainAddr prefix-ing, I think
> qemu_hotplug.c already uses qemuDomain prefixes, so keeping virDomain
> (for now) should be OK.
>
> Would you want to see the adjustment?
>
No need for that.
OK - tks -
John