On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
My own machine has a virtual network on 192.168.123.0/24, and
I've
been told that it's a common selection for people who create a second
network after libvirt's default (and in the past was used as a manual
alternative for the default network itself when 192.168.122.0/24
Heh, me too in fact :-)
casued a conflict). Changing to 192.168.97.0/24 also isn't
foolproof,
but it's much less likely to encounter a conflict leading to a failed
test.
Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine(a)laine.org>
---
scripts/networks/networkxml2hostout/tck-testnet-3.dat | 4 ++--
scripts/networks/networkxml2hostout/tck-testnet-3.post.dat | 4 ++--
scripts/networks/networkxml2xmlin/tck-testnet-3.xml | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|