Re: [libvirt] question about rdma migration

Hi Roy, On 02/09/2016 03:57 AM, Roy Shterman wrote: You're absolutey right, the RDMA migration code itself doesn't set this lock limit explicitly because there are system-wide restrictions in both appArmour, /etc/security, as well as SELINUX that restrict applications from arbitrarily setting their maximum memory lock limits. The other problem is CGROUPS: If someone sets a cgroup control for maximum memory and forgets about that mlock() limits, then there will be a conflict. So, libvirt must have a policy to deal with all of these possibilities, not just handle a special case for RDMA migration. The only way "simple" way (without patching the problems above) to apply a higher lock limit to QEMU is to set the ulimit for libvirt (or for QEMU if starting QEMU manually) in your environment or the command line with $ ulimit # before attempting the migration, then the RDMA subsystem will be able to lock the memory successfully. The other option is to use /etc/security/limits.conf and set the option for a specific libvirt process user and make sure your libvirt/qemu are not running as root. QEMU itself also has a "mlock" option built into the command line, but it also suffers from the same problem --- you have to find a way (currently) to increase the limit before using the option. Yes, lots of comparisons. http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/RDMALiveMigration http://www.canturkisci.com/ETC/papers/IBMJRD2011/preprint.pdf