22.06.2015 14:15, Mikhail Feoktistov пишет:
We need to handle events with PIE_DISPATCHER type.
Could you
please shed some more light on why we need this. I guess it
fixes some problem, so more explanation could be useful.
Do not write error messages to log in case of unhandled event types.
Again, please explain why we shouldn't log them as errors if we return
them as failure.
---
src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c b/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
index 34605ea..d208c19 100644
--- a/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
+++ b/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
@@ -1685,8 +1685,7 @@ prlsdkHandleVmEvent(parallelsConnPtr privconn, PRL_HANDLE
prlEvent)
return prlsdkHandleVmRemovedEvent(privconn, uuid);
break;
default:
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("Can't handle event of type %d"), prlEventType);
+ VIR_DEBUG("Skipping event type %d", prlEventType);
return PRL_ERR_FAILURE;
}
@@ -1721,6 +1720,7 @@ prlsdkEventsHandler(PRL_HANDLE prlEvent, PRL_VOID_PTR opaque)
switch (prlIssuerType) {
case PIE_VIRTUAL_MACHINE:
+ case PIE_DISPATCHER:
pret = prlsdkHandleVmEvent(privconn, prlEvent);
break;
default: