On 06/13/2012 02:25 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> Also, getfd automatically closes a fd if an existing fdname is
passed
> again.
> I don't think this is a good behavior, I think pass-fd should fail
> instead
> (note that we can't fix getfd though).
>
I agree. It makes sense to fail rather than blindly closing the
existing fd. It can be closed explicitly with closefd if the user wants
it closed.
Hmm - what happens if I do 'pass-fd name', learn that qemu is using fd
42, then do 'getfd name'? I silently wipe out fd 42 and replace it with
the new fd passed in by getfd. Which means my use of /dev/fd/42 will
now be broken.
Obviously that means that 'getfd' should NOT be used by any application
using 'pass-fd', and that libvirt should NOT be reusing names (I think
the latter is already true). But I agree that for back-compat we can't
get rid of the current (evil) semantics of a duplicated 'getfd'.
You may also want to mention that when using 'getfd' or 'pass-fd', there
are some commands (like migrate) that use the fd:name protocol, and that
a successful use of one of these commands implicitly closes the named
fd; but that all new uses of /dev/fd/nnn leave the fd open and an
explicit closefd must be used to avoid leaking indefinitely-opened fds
in qemu.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org