On 06/01/2011 04:52 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
>> +++ b/src/security/security_manager.c
>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ virSecurityManagerPtr virSecurityManagerNew(const char
*name,
>>
>> void *virSecurityManagerGetPrivateData(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr)
>> {
>> - return ((char*)mgr) + sizeof(mgr);
>> + return ((char*)mgr) + sizeof(*mgr);
>
> I suppose I could have used:
>
> return mgr + 1;
>
> instead, since that gives the same address with less typing. Any
> preferences on which form to commit?
>
I'd say go with the more readable mgr + 1.
Thanks, and pushed as follows:
void *virSecurityManagerGetPrivateData(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr)
{
- return ((char*)mgr) + sizeof(mgr);
+ /* This accesses the memory just beyond mgr, which was allocated
+ * via VIR_ALLOC_VAR earlier. */
+ return mgr + 1;
}
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org