On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 20:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I've just hacked up a similar approach to the one DBus uses to
fail
the 'nth' malloc
Does that fail exactly the nth malloc or the nth malloc and after (or
from nth malloc to (n+k)th malloc) ? The latter two are more realistic
for an OOM scenario, and make sure you don't blow up in some error
handling routine.
and run the 'xmconfigtest' test case for every 'n'
between 1 and 200 and OOM handling worked correctly in every case.
Excellent.
David