Eric Blake wrote:
Does this patch still apply as is?
No, so I just re-submitted a rebased patch-set:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-August/msg00581.html
It should be noted that my patches constantly gets in a conflicting
state versus your master since they add capabilities, and that seems to
be the most rapidly changing place in the code base. Luckily such
conflicts are trivial to resolve. In fact, since my second patch
submission in May [1], in which I (hope I) fixed all issues found in the
review [2] of my first submission in March [3], resolving these types of
trivial conflicts is the only thing I've done.
[1]
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-May/msg02039.html
[2]
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg01065.html
[3]
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg01051.html
I apologize on behalf of a busy team
that sometimes patches don't get reviewed, and it is okay to send pings
every week or so as needed to spur someone on to looking at it.
Ok. Please let me know if there's anything, process-wise, I can do too
smoothen this further. Otherwise I'll just continue sending rebased
patches as pings every week or two.
Cheers!