On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 14:11:00 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 13:55 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID dereferences the pointer, thus if we pass NULL
> into virNetDevSetIPAddress it crashes. Regression introduced by
> b3d069872ce53eb.
>
> Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325120
> ---
> src/util/virnetdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virnetdev.c b/src/util/virnetdev.c
> index 712c3bc..0d030a3 100644
> --- a/src/util/virnetdev.c
> +++ b/src/util/virnetdev.c
> @@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ int virNetDevSetIPAddress(const char *ifname,
> unsigned int recvbuflen;
>
> /* The caller needs to provide a correct address */
> - if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_FAMILY(addr) == AF_INET &&
!VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID(peer)) {
> + if (VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_FAMILY(addr) == AF_INET && peer &&
!VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID(peer)) {
> /* compute a broadcast address if this is IPv4 */
> if (VIR_ALLOC(broadcast) < 0)
> return -1;
The other version of virNetDevSetIPAddress() starting on
line 1435 needs to be fixed in a similar fashion. Also,
doesn't 'addr' need to be checked as well?
'addr' is declared as ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL. Also it wasn't touched by that
patch so I don't thinkso.
Ah, right. I do have linux and libnl. I hate conditionally compiled
code.
I'd like to have all of these fixed in a single patch, but
this change is good even by itself so it's up to you :)
I'll squash the second fix in. I just didn't bother to look for a
possible second instance.
ACK
Does that apply to the fixed version?
Peter