Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: support type-based unions
On 28.03.24 12:40, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Subject: all unions are type-based. Perhaps "support implicit
union
tags on the wire"?
Yes, sounds good.
Do you need this schema language feature for folding block jobs into the
jobs abstraction, or is it just for making the wire protocol nicer in
places?
It's not necessary, we can proceed with job-* API, specifying both type and id.
But I think, as we are not in a hurry, better to make new job-* API more effective from
the beginning.
--
Best regards,
Vladimir