Hey,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 05:36:25PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
That evaluates ptr twice. We can do better, by exploiting that the
ternary operator can be used to determine the type of an expression
without evaluating it. Gcc allows 1?(void*)expr:pointer (the resulting
type is void*), but hates 1?(void*)expr:int (promoting to int provokes a
warning):
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
remote.c: In function 'remoteDispatchListNetworks':
remote.c:3684:70: error: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional
expression
So how about:
Sorry for the late answer, but this looks good to me too. Let's hope gcc
doesn't get too clever and never stops warning about this.
Thanks,
Christophe