Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 05/14] rpc: Be more precise in which cases the authentication is needed

On 12/12/2017 06:36 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote: > Additionally, use a whitelist model to decide whether authentication > is needed or not. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; > Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; > Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; > Reviewed-by: Stefan Zimmermann <stzi(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; > --- > src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Considering later patches... Why not introduce the Locked version here which just returns (client->auth == VIR_NET_SERVER_SERVICE_AUTH_NONE)? and of course alter the commit message to say Introduce *Locked.

Hazards of not peeking forward by me. John > diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c b/src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c > index b454a3ff6992..0ee299e2d6ec 100644 > --- a/src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c > +++ b/src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c > @@ -1512,10 +1512,10 @@ int virNetServerClientSendMessage(virNetServerClientPtr client, > > bool virNetServerClientNeedAuth(virNetServerClientPtr client) > { > - bool need = false; > + bool need = true; > virObjectLock(client); > - if (client->auth) > - need = true; > + if (client->auth == VIR_NET_SERVER_SERVICE_AUTH_NONE) > + need = false; > virObjectUnlock(client); > return need; > } >