Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] docs: Update style for <dt> elements

> This styling is appropriate when the content of <dt> is a > <code> element, because that makes the font smaller. > > This is the case for most of the <dt>s in our documentation, > but not *all* of them. I've just posted a patch[1] that fixes > a bunch of <dt>s that were missing the inner <code> element, > but that still leaves out a few that are just not supposed to > have it - look no further than contact.html for an example. > > So my proposal is, apply my patch first, and then add > >   dt code { >     font-weight: bold; >   } > > to the stylesheet instead. > > Sounds good? I saw your series - been a VERY BUSY day on libvir-list...  In any case wouldn't that make *all* <code> elements bolded - there's a lot more of those and then the <dt> bolding wouldn't stand out