On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:05:42AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 05:55:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:33:46AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > In other words, the current implementation of g_poll() on macOS
> > > doesn't follow the contract defined by GLib itself. It seems to me
> > > that this is a (fairly serious) bug in the library, no?
> >
> > It is significant, but long standing. GLib actually had this behaviour
> > forever on macOS, but it regressed when Meson was introduced, until
> > the recent fix.
> >
> > The question is whether efficiency trumps API semantics. Normally I'm
> > heavily biased towards API semantics, but poll is a performance
> > critical API, so it isn't so easy to declare we must workaround all
> > the quirks.
> >
> > I filed a bug to raise the subject for discussion though
> >
> >
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2644
>
> That's an excellent bug report! Thanks for spending time on it, and
> let's see where the upstream discussion leads :)
>
Just so I don't sway the potential discussion in the issue to the wrong
way, I'll ask here. Since BROKEN_POLL is used due to poll() on OS/X not
behaving correctly with fds=NULL, nfds=0 [0], wouldn't it be possible to
"fix" at least the internal calls to g_poll() which are done when
running the main loop since they always have at least one FD (the
eventfd used to signal the main loop [1])? I know it would not fix the
problem, but it would at least workaround the part that is used the
most, I presume.
The comment is somewhat misleading - the nfds=0 case is not actually
the main problem they were fixing. The real killer issue is that
poll() doesn't work with block/char devices - ie any /dev/NNN FD.
This is what broke QEMU because it failed with TAP device FDs.
Dunno why the comment mentions nfds=0 because the the original
commit message describes the device node FDs scenario.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: