On 1/30/25 02:09, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 1/29/25 18:35, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> I eventually need something like 1/2 for the mapped-ram support.
> Currently qemuSaveImageOpen does too much IMO. I've been working on an
> improvement to this series and would like to get opinions on that first.
> And before posting I'll be sure to test it on master, without the
> mapped-ram patches :-).
>
I'm not against it. I'd need to look at mapped-ram patches, but I
believe you. Go for it! Just make sure to test restore ;-)
Done now
https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/EC...
I tested save/restore with and without bypass-cache, using compression, and
managed save.
Jim