On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:35:23PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >
> > > +#define MAX_INDENT 100
> > > +
> > > +static void
> > > +cmdNodeListDevicesPrint(vshControl *ctl,
> > > + char **devices,
> > > + char **parents,
> > > + int num_devices,
> > > + int devid,
> > > + int lastdev,
> > > + unsigned int depth,
> > > + char *indent)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > + int nextlastdev = -1;
> >
> > Before even modifying indent[depth] here I would check that
> > depth + 2 < MAX_INDENT and abort on an error here,
>
> Actually we have a 4 level indent here. This is all getting
> rather confusing, so I've separated the depth we've descended
> from the indentation used, and defined the buffer to be a
> multiple of max depth.
>
> Also fixed a minor leak in the virNodeDeviceGetParent() impl
> of the remote driver. In the wonderful world of XDR, we have
> to free the char**, but not the char *.
Okidoc, ACK !
Great, committed this
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|