On 05/10/2011 02:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:26:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> As far as I can tell, if QEMU exits abruptly or with a non-zero
> status code, libvirt treats this as a domain destruction given no
> real indication to the user that something bad happened.
libvirtd raises an event.
But that event is no different than the event fired for a normal guest
shutdown, no?
There is (was?) a "reason" argument
(eg. "reason" == "watchdog fired"). I've a vague recollection
this
was discussed but never added. I can't find it in the code right now,
but I might be looking for the wrong thing ...
> But libvirt does have a crashed state for domains, it's just not
> used for QEMU guests.
I'll just make a historical note that the crashed state corresponded
to a state in Xen. Essentially the states in libvirt are directly
mapped to the ones listed in the Xen xm man page here:
http://linux.die.net/man/1/xm
I'm well aware of that :-)
That's why I asked whether not using the crash state was intentional (if
it's deprecated as a general API).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> I was wondering how intention of a design decision this was. Right
> now there's no good way for a management tool to detect a crashed
> guest/QEMU. Is there something I'm overlooking?
Rich.