On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:29:05AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/15/2014 01:46 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:54:51AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On 09/08/2014 07:40 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> + <ref name="virSwitch"/>
>>
>> Purely cosmetic, but how about calling them "virYesNo" and
"virOnOff" to
>> avoid confusion? When I see "virBool" I think "true/false",
and when I
>> see "virSwitch" I think "Does this have something to do with a
network
>> device?" :-)
>>
>
> That's another way (and makes more sense). I just wanted to shorten
> the "Tristate" since it's not a tristate anyway. Should I count it as
> an ACK for s/virSwitch/virOnOff/ and s/virBool/virYesNo/ ?
Yes, I'll agree to that rename.
There were more things to be changed, so I sent a completely new
version with this changed:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-September/msg00894.html
Martin