Eric Blake wrote:
According to Jim Meyering on 3/1/2010 10:13 AM:
> Here's a case in which using an assertion appears to be the only
> way to tell clang that "client" really is non-NULL at that point.
> I'm sure clang's analyzers will eventually improve, and hence avoid
> this sort of false positive, so have marked this with a FIXME comment,
> to help ensure we eventually remove this otherwise unnecessary assertion.
...
On the other hand, perhaps a more invasive rewrite would also work
while
also avoiding assert(), by hoisting the worker->quitRequest into the while
loop, something like:
while ((client = qemudPendingJob(server)) == NULL) {
if (worker->quitRequest
|| virCondWait(&server->job, &server->lock) < 0) {
virMutexUnlock(&server->lock);
return NULL;
}
}
if (worker->quitRequest) {
virMutexUnlock(&client->lock);
virMutexUnlock(&server->lock);
return NULL;
}
Should I write that into patch format?
Yes, please.
That is equivalent, placates clang, and is more readable.
Thanks!