On Tuesday 05 May 2015 03:20 PM, Prerna Saxena wrote:
On Tuesday 05 May 2015 01:52 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:43:21AM +0530, Prerna Saxena wrote:
>> Libvirt periodically calls 'stat' on all volumes in a storage pool,
>> to update fields such as 'target.allocation'.
>>
>> The operation doesnt make sense for a volume which is curently being allocated.
> From the comments in the storage driver, the point of allowing refresh
> for a volume that is currently being allocated is to track the progress
> of the allocation.
>
>> Also, the 'target.allocation' sub-field is taken into account while
copying a raw image.
>> To suppress any (potential) corruption, libvirt must not attempt to refresh a
volume currently being built.
> What would be the corruption?
>
> We do not allow using a volume that is currently building as a
> source for cloning the volume - storageVolCreateXMLFrom checks for
> origvol->building:
>
> if (origvol->building) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
> _("volume '%s' is still being allocated."),
> origvol->name);
> goto cleanup;
> }
>
While running libvirt on PowerPC, I saw an interesting scenario. The
'target.allocation' field seemed to change for a volume getting allocated, and
this would lead to incomplete copy. This would
happen at random intervals, not deterministically. While looking through the code, I
found this to be the other place in code where the same field seemed to change without a
lock. Hence the patch.
I have sent the second patch which fixes the erring code too :
- remain = vol->target.allocation;
+ remain = inputvol->target.capacity;
More fundamental question -- why do we offload the copying of non-raw images to
qemu-img tool, but make libvirt responsible for copying raw volumes ?
Would it not be better if libvirt called on 'qemu-img' to copy all types of
volumes, including raw ones ?
--
Prerna Saxena
Linux Technology Centre,
IBM Systems and Technology Lab,
Bangalore, India