Daniel Veillard a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:27:52AM +0100, Philippe Berthault wrote:
> Daniel Veillard a écrit :
>
>> it is 0.1.8 but with 12 patches which are backport of later bug fixes or
>> important features like localization, shareable disk support, core dump
>> support,
>> etc ...
>> I guess it's closer to 0.1.9 as a result than 0.1.8,
>>
>>
> Hum ! :-(
> Currently, the version of libvirt determines its unequivocal contents.
> With a patched version of libvirt, it becomes impossible in an
> application to known the functionalities level of libvirt if the version
> number is identical to a non-patched libvirt.
>
> Could you explain how it's possible from an application to distinguish
> between a patched libvirt and a non-patched libvirt or another patched
> version of libvirt by using the virGetVersion() function ?
>
Can explain your problem instead ?
What is the feature or behaviour you need to detect ?
We have to know if the Attach/Detach devices functions will be in the
libvirt library of RHEL-5 RC1 and also if some enhancements of the XML
format will be present such as currentMemory, ...