On 02/24/2011 12:59 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 14:35:23 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> valgrind warns:
>
> ==21079== Syscall param rt_sigaction(act->sa_mask) points to uninitialised
byte(s)
> ==21079== at 0x329840F63E: __libc_sigaction (sigaction.c:67)
> ==21079== by 0x4E5A8E7: __virExec (util.c:661)
>
> Regression introduced in commit ab07533e. Technically, sa_mask
> shouldn't affect operation if sa_flags selects sa_handler, and
> sa_handler selects SIG_IGN, but better safe than sorry.
Not to mention that shutting up valgrind on spurious warnings makes it
easier to find the real ones.
Yeah, I agree. ACK.
Thanks; pushed.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org