On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:23:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 04/01/2013 04:07 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>
>
>On 03/21/2013 11:42 AM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger<stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>>+
>>+char *
>>+virTPMFindCancelPath(void)
>>+{
>>+ unsigned int idx;
>>+ int len;
>>+ DIR *pnp_dir;
>>+ char path[100], *p;
>
>Is there any reason not to use PATH_MAX instead of 100 here?
You get a compiler error then due to the function using too much
space on the stack.
The answer to that is *NOT* to use a shorter 100 byte buffer,
but to use virAsprintf() instead of snprintf(). Never use
fixed length buffers for filepaths.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|