On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:49:33 +0200
Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:31:50PM +0200, Wim ten Have wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:36:58 +0200
>Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> >diff --git a/src/conf/cpu_conf.c b/src/conf/cpu_conf.c
>> >index c21d11d..8d804a1 100644
>> >--- a/src/conf/cpu_conf.c
>> >+++ b/src/conf/cpu_conf.c
>> >@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ virCPUDefFormatBufFull(virBufferPtr buf,
>> > if (virCPUDefFormatBuf(&childrenBuf, def, updateCPU) < 0)
>> > goto cleanup;
>> >
>> >- if (virDomainNumaDefCPUFormat(&childrenBuf, numa) < 0)
>> >+ if (virDomainNumaDefCPUFormatXML(&childrenBuf, numa) < 0)
>> > goto cleanup;
>
>> Changing function names should be separate patch. Why is this
>> changed anyway?
>
>I renamed virDomainNumaDefCPUFormat() to virDomainNumaDefCPUFormatXML()
>to make it consistent with already existing function names like
> virDomainNumaDefCPUParseXML()
>
Then put it in a separate patch.
Sure. Do you advise me to put this patch in same or in a separated set?
- Wim.