Re: [libvirt] RFC: Supporting IPv6 on libvirt virtual networks
On 03/11/2010, at 5:26 AM, Laine Stump <laine(a)laine.org> wrote:
<snip>
<ip family="ipv6" address="2001:db8:1::10"
prefix="128"/>
<ip family="ipv6" address="2001:4978:2ac::1"
prefix="48">
<radvd/>
Is "radvd" too implementation dependent?
Just thinking that as we expand out our platform support over time, if we support setting
up bridges on other OS's then would radvd be what's used? (I actually have no
idea, it may very well be)