Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v6 0/9] Incremental backups, focus on API

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:13:44 -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm fairly confident that these API are ready to go (that is, I've got > qemu code in the wings to implement these API for the qemu driver, as > demonstrated at last KVM forum, and it shouldn't be too hard to add > support in the test driver to get some 'make check' coverage similar > to what I recently added for snapshots). I'm hoping the APIs make it > in for 5.2, even if I'm still dealing with review churn on the later > parts of my v5 series (there has been a lot of rebasing from earlier > review comments, so v5 is currently still the most recent version that > I was able to run demos with, although I hope to post the rest of v6 > soon). I'm still not persuaded that pushing any API without implementation is a good idea. (No, test driver implementation does not count). If the consensus of others is that it's good to go then go ahead, but I want to voice this concern here.