Re: [libvirt] Licensing of the schemas?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Diego Elio ???Flameeyes??? Petten? wrote:
Il giorno gio, 17/12/2009 alle 09.11 +0100, Daniel Veillard ha
scritto:
>
> No idea what Portage is. Please keep the schemas in the main or
> client
> package and not as a separated chunk, there is really no reason to put
> them out, virsh, virt-xml-validate and the schemas should all be in
> the
> same package.
The RNGs are in the main package (we don't really split packages unless
we have a hard need, we're neither Debian nor Fedora).
On the other hand, nxml-mode (part of Emacs 23) works with RNCs, so
right now there is a *separate* package that takes the libvirt's
sources, translates the RNGs in RNCs via trang, and installs them with
the location list in the Emacs library tree.
You really should try to give me some credit, I've been doing this stuff
for over five years by now???
I'm not fussed about whatever packaging split you choose - that's upto
distros to decide. From a functional POV it is merely neccessary to ensure
that whenever the libvirt.so is installed, the RNGs are also guarenteed
to be present. If they're separate packages with dependencies, that's no
problem
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|