On 2012年12月15日 05:36, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/14/2012 08:43 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> Note that cdbfilter is not exactly match unpriv_sgio's value.
> VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_YES mean the kernel will filter the
> SCSI commands, which maps to 0 of unpriv_sgio;
> VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO maps to 1 of unpriv_sgio.
Again, I find this confusing to have negative logic, and think making
rawio a tri-state will make it easier to reason about which disks have
allowed unpriv_sgio vs. the default of being filtered.
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
> index c3ecf6f..bcea0ff 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
> @@ -3730,10 +3730,19 @@ int qemuProcessStart(virConnectPtr conn,
> _("Raw I/O is not supported on this
platform"));
> #endif
>
> - if (disk->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_BLOCK&& disk->shared)
{
> + if (disk->type == VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_TYPE_BLOCK&& disk->shared)
{
The re-indent could be pushed independently and prior to the release
(or, if it was introduced earlier in the series, then fix that earlier
patch).
Okay.
> if (qemuAddSharedDisk(driver->sharedDisks, disk->src)< 0)
> goto cleanup;
> }
> +
> + /* Set sysfs unpriv_sgio if cdbfilter is specified */
> + if (disk->cdbfilter) {
> + if (virSetDeviceUnprivSGIO(disk->src, NULL,
> + (disk->cdbfilter ==
> + VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO)
> + ? 1 : 0)< 0)
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
Would it be any simpler to write:
virSetDeviceUnprivSGIO(disk->src, NULL,
disk->cdbfilter != VIR_DOMAIN_DISK_CDB_FILTER_NO)< 0
but you may be rewriting this anyways.
Yeah, it's better.