On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 09.08.2013 18:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:58:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> [CC'ing qemu-devel list]
>>> On 09.08.2013 15:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:13:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>>> On 08/09/2013 06:56 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
So what's the conclusion? Should I push the patch until qemu gets
stabilized in mem consumption (which can take a while - no offense to
qemu devels, I can imagine it's nontrivial).
Given the lack of any useful info to make memory limits work reliably,
I guess we don't have any choice but to remove this default memory limit,
and also recommend against people setting explicit memory limits too.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|